Google recently held an event in which they invited a small group of website owners who had been impacted strongly by the helpful content system. I’ll recap some of the great blog posts and tweet threads written about this. Then, I’d like to think upon what we can learn from what Google representatives said. The […]
Continue ReadingDid Google start to prioritize expertise over authority in September 2024? In this article, we'll look at sections of Forbes and CNN that saw traffic dips. In Glenn Gabe’s most recent article, he wrote about sites that were possible targets for abusing Google’s site reputation abuse policy were seeing declines. Google responded saying that this […]
Continue ReadingGoogle's most recent earnings call was quite optimistic. Here are the bits I found most interesting. AI Overviews In 18 months they have reduced the costs for AIO's by 90%. Google is seeing strong engagement with AIO's. They are increasing overall search usage and satisfaction. People who use them come back to search more often. […]
Continue ReadingGoogle has updated their documentation on their spam policies. This latest update to the spam guidelines has several changes I thought were interesting enough to write about. 1. Manipulation of search = spam Google added this to the beginning of their document: It's no surprise that content designed to deceive users is spam, but this […]
Continue ReadingTwiddlers are C++ code objects used in Google’s ranking algorithms that help Google re-order search results. They are used in a Google system called Superroot which is Google’s ranking framework. I came across this 2017 Google document on Twiddlers upon reading Mario Fischer’s excellent breakdown of what we can learn about how ranking works based […]
Continue ReadingWho is @iruletheworldmo? This mysterious account on X has been all I can think about for days now. I was duped. He used me to push his agenda. And I am thankful for this. It was all for good reason. Very good reason. We truly are not prepared for what is coming. (Added Aug 17. […]
Continue ReadingBefore you read this article, here is a newer one with information we learned when Google met with creators of sites impacted by the helpful content update.
The September 2023 Helpful Content has a catastrophic impact on many sites. It had an immediate impact for those given an unhelpful content classification. Most sites impacted have a large decline that starts some time between September 14, 2023 and September 18. For most sites impacted, the declines continue. At the time of this update, written in March 2024 I have not seen any meaningful recoveries following a significant helpful content update drop. I do believe recovery is possible for some sites impacted, but it will be difficult!
We need to completely change our understanding of what helpful content is.
Since the launch of the helpful content system in August of 2022, I have seen a few sites that have declined in conjunction with a helpful content update improve and go on to do well. However, none of those sites have had a devastating and catastrophic drop like pictured above.
I have yet to see a recovery following a significant September helpful content update hit. Many that were impacted have been further decimated by the March core and spam updates.
Let me start by sharing why I think some of you who are reading this will recover. Recover is not the right word. I think some who have historically made money from creating content will soon find new ways to blog creatively. And as we see Google reward more helpful content, in search and also in SGE-like helpful content carousels, we should see new opportunities opening up as we learn what it is that truly is helpful. (Hint – it’s not related to SEO. It’s about truly understanding your audience.)
I’m not seeing anyone yet who truly is creating the type of content that users would find helpful beyond the other websites they could visit.
The reason is because what I am suggesting would require extensive effort and would be quite a different business model from what you run today.
Here’s an example of a decent site that was impacted by HCU.
We talked about this site and why it was impacted by HCU in newsletter recently. It is a site that has good, well written guides on playing a game.
The thing is, there are a lot of well written guides about this game. And while people did find the guides helpful, what I believe this catastrophic drop means is that Google’s systems have decided that this site is not usually likely to be among the ones that a user engages with and that ends up satisfying a user’s search. People tend to read the guides from more authoritative places. And while these guides are good, they’re not substantially and consistently the ones people choose to learn from.
It’s a long story. So long, in fact, that it has taken me over a year to be able to understand and explain. I’ll soon be releasing a book called SEO in the Gemini Era: The Story of How AI changed Google Search. In it, I’ll share what I’ve learned from many hours of studying, including the DOJ vs Google trial documents,especially the Pandu Nayak testimony where he explains many aspects of Google’s AI brain for ranking, RankBrain, and learning more about how machine learning works.
Really it comes down to this:
There’s clearly more to ranking than just user preference. Google works hard to identify when queries should be met by authoritative sites. There are many things they do to help improve the quality of the results.
Still, being a result that users like, and find useful and helpful is important and really does play a significant role in rankings.
As I typed this, Google Search Liaison Danny Sullivan just tweeted this,
The way you show Google’s ranking systems that you should do well is to show your visitors a great, satisfying experience.
I think that the reason why we have not seen any helpful content update recoveries is because it’s really hard for us to understand what helpful content is.
Try this.
First, think of a keyword that you really should be ranking for.
Now, really put yourself in the shoes of a searcher. Where are they? Perhaps they are on the couch skimming through sites? Are they at the store quickly trying to decide which product to buy? Or maybe they are doing intensive research to help them solve a problem. In many cases your reader’s intent is likely not to read an article – unless it’s you looking for a solution to your helpful content suppression. 🙂 It’s often to get an answer or maybe not even to get an answer, but rather, to get more information to help them in making a purchasing decision. They might not want a full review, but rather, find it helpful to see what the folks on Reddit are complaining about in regards to a product.
Next, do the search on your phone. Click on each result as if you were a searcher. This includes looking at what’s available on SERP features like People Also Ask results. Take mental note of each thing this searcher is likely to learn that is likely to be considered helpful for meeting this searcher’s needs.
Perhaps the first post is from an authoritative site in your niche. It defines the problem well and shows the common solutions. Maybe the next is a forum or Reddit post where real people are discussing the issue.
Go right down the list of the first page of sites presented to the searcher.
Next, read your site from the perspective of a searcher who has already read the results available on the first page.
Really put yourselves in their shoes. Is it really clear that your site is substantially more helpful than all the others? They’re not going to appreciate that you have a few unique images, or interesting research perhaps if you make them scroll through pages of stuff they’ve already read elsewhere. If they’ve already read what the reviewers on Forbes or Wired or some authoritative site have read on your product, is your post really enticing enough for them to want to read it as well?
I know it does not seem right that the giant authority sites get preference. People do tend to click more on brands they recognize, so you have an uphill climb. I do believe this will change as Google gets better and better at learning which content users are likely to find helpful. Especially now that, as we will soon see, helpfulness can be understood at the page level.
As you put yourself in the shoes of this searcher think about what types of things this searcher would find helpful that you could produce that don’t currently exist online. If you are not the go-to source of information for this topic, the only way to rank will be to produce something that provides the user with “information gain.”
For example, for the gaming site above, instead of producing a guide on the game, I might produce a body of work with things like this:
It’s not just enough to create the above content. It really needs to be so good that people truly want to read it and find it helpful.
Google doesn’t need more informational guides. They need fresh, new, original and insightful content.
You likely should noindex or remove from your site everything that was created for search engines only.
The frustrating thing though, is that for many of you, although you content is decent and well written and indeed helpful, it really was written more because of the opportunity to rank and get search traffic than out of a need to share something you know your audience is hungry for.
This means that we will no longer see helpful content updates. It also sounds like Google’s helpful content classifier has changed.
With the launch of the March core update which integrated the helpful content system into the core ranking systems, Google produced this documentation that told us their ranking systems understand helpfulness on the page level. I believe this is new. This is exciting, because it does seem to open the door for more truly helpful content to rank on the merit of its helpfulness rather than on the strength of brand signals.
Again, I do believe sites can recover. But I think that there are not many sites who have been strongly impacted that truly have made substantial enough change so that searchers would consistently consider their content the most helpful.
In December of 2022, Google changed the rater guidelines to add more emphasis on experience, saying, “E-A-T gets an extra E for Experience.” This update rewarded sites demonstrating real world experience.
The rater guidelines help the raters understand the ideals Google wants their algorithms to reward. In this most recent update, they added a new line under section 2.2: Understanding the Purpose of a Webpage:
“To share a personal experience, perspective, or feelings on a topic.”
In my analysis of keywords of sites impacted by the recent updates, it was quite common to see that Google had elevated pages that demonstrated real world experience.
It makes sense that after instructing the raters to consider experience in their evaluation of helpfulness, the algorithms would shift to better prefer pages from sites with experience.
Here are some examples based on the types of sites I’ve seen Google start to elevate following helpful content updates. And also, what the QRG says.
Check to see if your rankings are now showing real world businesses. If so, this will be hard to beat.
The QRG shows example after example of pages that are to be considered high quality because the site is a popular resource for its topic. For example, The Knot is a popular wedding site. The Onion is listed as being known for its humor. I’ve seen a couple of niche recipe sites impacted that had decent content and good recipes, but weren’t known for any particular thing about their recipes. You might have a great recipe for lamb, but unless there’s evidence that people tend to seek you out for your recipes, especially your lamb ones, Google is likely going to show searchers other sites.
I believe some of you who were impacted will be able to recover by learning how to produce content that’s so good you become known for your topic.
The QRG says,
“For some topics, Experience is the most important dimension of Trust. For other topics, assessing Expertise through the posts may be important.”
If you are an expert in your topic, I believe you can possibly convince Google’s systems you have real world experience by incorporating more user generated content. This may be in the form of helpful comments and discussion or perhaps a well maintained forum.
Your goal should be to get real conversations going around your topics.
What we have seen so far is that some sites known for public discussion like Reddit and Quora are seeing significant increases in rankings and traffic. Some have criticized these as lacking E-E-A-T, but really, these are conversations between people sharing their experiences!
Let’s look back again to the quality rater guidelines. The previous version read,
The new version tells us so much more. Most importantly, “For some topics, experience is the most important dimension of Trust.”
Regarding experience, the guidelines say, “Consider the extent to which the content creator has the necessary first-hand or life experience for the topic. Many types of pages are trustworthy and achieve their purpose well when created by people with a wealth of personal experience.”
Forums are people sharing their experiences with other people.
If you do have real world experience in your niche, then I would encourage you to start brainstorming about how you can demonstrate that in a way no one else can. Make it your goal to become known for your topic…not because of marketing…but because you are passionate about it and share things that others find valuable.
I believe that we are headed to the age where Google is an AI answer engine. Actually we are here. I can walk through my garden and use Google Lens and Gemini or ChatGPT to ask questions like, “What are these holes on my grape leaves”, or “How do I prune this plant?” Gemini answered many of my questions. Lens sent me to many websites, some blogs, some well known authorities, and quite often a forum such as Reddit with real people discussing their issues to help me answer my questions.
As we see more users turn to AI, in many cases they will still want websites, but they will want those that truly teach them something they don’t know. If you can create that, there is likely opportunity for you to recover. People want to visit your website to read about your experience, not to be taught what the textbooks or general wisdom of the world knows.
I believe that not many know how to create this type of content – because it’s a foreign concept for us. As marketers, we often try to emulate big brands, or do what other marketers are doing.
Which makes it hard to be considered original!
If you are heavily impacted by this update here are my recommendations:
The rater guidelines speak extensively on being known for your topics. Google wants to recommend content from people who are known. While it’s ok to use marketing, the people whom Google’s systems want to reward are those who are known because they’re passionate about what they do in a way that is engaging and helpful.
There’s a reason why this is listed in the helpful content criteria.
A thriving forum filled with experts and enthusiasts truly talking about your topic might create content others would find useful! A forum just for the sake of having ugc is not.
I mean yes, but only if you have an active customer base that buys from it. I do believe that when real people spend real money with your website or engaging with your services, it can send signals to indicate to Google that people find your site helpful. But I would not add a store just because that’s what Google likes.
I expect we will see more and more integration of YouTube shorts into Google’s search results and alongside SGE or Gemini answers as these are a great way to showcase experience.
The September 2023 helpful content update had a significant negative impact on many sites. And many impacted worsened during the March 2024 core update. In many cases it is affecting content that lacks real world experience. A huge culprit is a lack of originally helpful information. If impacted, it means that Google’s systems have decided your content is not likely the most helpful result to show searchers.
It is possible to get the classification removed. You will need to “improve and fix” the issues, which likely means removing content that adds little value to the web, and vastly improving the helpfulness what remains.
This is devastating news for many who have been able to make an income from blogging online. I do not think it is the end for all of you though! Those who can determine how to truly help your audience and become known as a passionate enthusiast for your topic, are likely to succeed.
Once you’ve read this article, jump on over to this one, published in June in which we see that we may need to see another core update in order to see recovery following a helpful content suppression.
Want to read more? I’d recommend this content I’ve created:
Google’s Helpful Content & Other AI Systems May Be Impacting Your Site’s Visibility This is a long article I wrote to try and explain how Google’s AI systems like the helpful content and reviews systems are radically changing search.
What changed with the September 14, 2023 helpful content system update
Filter by: